Today the Court decided one case dealing with workers compensation issues.
In Matter of Steuber , the claimant appealed a decision of the Board that found that the claimant did not injure his thoracic spine and denied his claim for benefits.
Claimant applied for workers compensation benefits after falling at work in March 2010, and his claim was established for injuries to his back, left knee and left hip. While claimant had degenerative changes throughout his spine, he further injured his lumbar spine as a result of the initial accident.
Claimant thereafter underwent thoracic spine surgery in 2011, and the employer and its workers compensation carrier objected to paying for the surgery upon the ground thatit was not causally connected to his claim. The Workers Compensation Board ultimately agreed, and claimant appealed. The Court affirmed.
The Court stated there was no dispute that claimant had a degenerative condition in his thoracic spine that did not become symptomatic as a result of the initial accident. Whileclaimant s orthopedic surgeon testified that the condition became symptomatic as a result of later falls that were consequential to claimant s initial accident, an independent medical examiner who evaluated claimant disagreed. Specifically, the examiner not only found claimant s thoracic condition to be unrelated to the compensable accident, but opined that his subsequent falls were not caused by the injuries sustained in that accident. Moreover, claimant s orthopedist admitted that his thoracic condition might have become symptomatic even in the absence of any physical of any physical trauma. Thus, the Board credited the examiner s opinion and, deferring to that assessment of credibility, we find substantial evidence in the record to support the determination (see Matter of Franco v Peckham Indus., Inc., 91 AD3d 997, 997-998 , lv denied 18 NY3d 810 ; Matter of Kot v Beth Ameth Home Attendant Serv., 70 AD3d 1114, 1115 ; Matter of Banner v Anheuser-Busch Cos., Inc., 59 AD3d 759, 760 ). Claimant s remaining contentions were Â examined and the Court found them to lack merit.